Spotting
 Timeline
 Travel Tip
 Trip
 Race
 Social
 Greeting
 Poll
 Img
 PNR
 Pic
 Blog
 News
 Conf TL
 RF Club
 Convention
 Monitor
 Topic
 #
 Rating
 Correct
 Wrong
 Stamp
 PNR Ref
 PNR Req
 Blank PNRs
 HJ
 Vote
 Pred
 @
 FM Alert
 FM Approval
 Pvt
News Super Search
 ↓ 
×
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Category:
Zone:
Language:
IR Press Release:

Search
  Go  
dark modesite support
 
Thu Oct 3 02:12:07 IST
Home
Trains
ΣChains
Atlas
PNR
Forum
Quiz
Topics
Gallery
News
FAQ
Trips
Login
RailCal Android App
RailCal iPhone App
Advanced Search
<<prev entry    next entry>>
News Entry# 257282
मोदी सरकार के तीसरे रेल बजट से पहले राजद अध्यक्ष व पूर्व रेलमंत्री लालू प्रसाद ने प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी को पत्र लिखकर रेलवे की खस्ता माली...
ऐसे तो रेलवे का दिवाला निकलना तय,2016-17 में कम से कम 60 हजार करोड़ के घाटे का अनुमान-मोदी को लालू का खत

130 Posts

6858 views
0

Feb 16 2016 (14:28)
guest   102 blog posts
Re# 1738876-131              
If curvy konkan railway deserves doubling then why nt pune mrj. Pune-sbc via mrj, bgm, hubali is more populous than the via sur, gulbarga route. Hence it deserves doubling. Thank god SWR HQ HUBBALLI lies on this track. And where is 200 Crore ? It is still on paper. Only fls survey of pune londha line is done. Then progress is zero. Even tenders related to doubling of pune londha line didnt published or opened.
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

5940 views
1

Feb 17 2016 (10:53)
anvitjoshi^~
anvitjoshi^~   2338 blog posts
Re# 1738876-132              
Sir Konkan is a perfect route, already capable of handling trains at 180 kmph. I was travelling in a loco, train was running at 90 kmph inside tunnel. When I asked loco pilot about the speed, he told he Rajdhani and JanShatabdi already runs at 120 kmph and if rules are relaxed, then this route is ready for 150 kmph action. Now coming to UBL - MRJ - PUNE doubling, it clearly doesn't deserve more funds than GTL - YNK doubling for 2 reasons: terrain is good and distance is very less. If at all it deserves doubling, the rate of return (calculated by IR) would not have been in negative value for this line as compared to the value of 8 for GTL - YNK line. As far as patronage is concerned, none of trains via GR, SUR on CST-MAS/HYB/SBC run empty as against some trains via UBL, MRJ. So...
more...
the question of being more populous doesn't do justification for patronage. The matter of fact is, single line itself is not completely utilized. Many more trains can be run on existing PUNE - MRJ - UBL - SBC line.

Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

13458 views
0

Feb 26 2016 (14:14)
RailfanWR
RailfanWR   1491 blog posts
Re# 1738876-133              
correct hai , jo train lalu ke sasural jati hai uski income kya hai?
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

5945 views
0

Feb 26 2016 (14:17)
RailfanWR
RailfanWR   1491 blog posts
Re# 1738876-134              
just read 2009 rail budget by mamta no need of TOI she describe that railway was in profit or loss
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

6241 views
0

Feb 26 2016 (17:59)
TouristerDivyanshu^~
TouristerDivyanshu^~   174376 blog posts
Re# 1738876-135              
sir aap reports dekh lijiye kisi RM ki speech se jayada truth report hoti h railway ki
kitne loss me thi railway
aur duronto k commercial halts diye gae isse hi proof ho jata h ki duronto jesi na jaane kitni train hongi loss me jo ki chl rhi h
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom
Go to Mobile site
Important Note: This website NEVER solicits for Money or Donations. Please beware of anyone requesting/demanding money on behalf of IRI. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.
India Rail Info Privacy Policy